=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/[email protected]>
================
@@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ void recopy(int fst, ...) {
va_list va, va2;
va_start(va, fst);
va_copy(va2, va); // expected-note{{Initialized va_list}}
- va_copy(va2, va); // expected-warning{{Initialized va_list 'va2' is
initialized again}}
- // expected-note@-1{{Initialized va_list 'va2' is initialized again}}
+ va_copy(va2, va); // expected-warning{{Initialized va_list 'va2' is
overwritten by another initialized one}}
+ // expected-note@-1{{Initialized va_list 'va2' is overwritten by another
initialized one}}
----------------
steakhal wrote:
I wonder if all the code paths are covered in the message generation and table
lookups in this patch.
I was surprised only how few of the tests were affected by the message
improvements; which was a red flag to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157846
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
