frobtech wrote: > Is there any particular reason for using the `/option:value` syntax over > `-option:value` given that `lld-link` supports both?
It's the common convention for the tool syntax that `lld-link` is emulating. It's consistent with the MSVC driver in Clang. That makes it easier to compare link lines between the two backends, for example. It's also possible that the UEFI backend could be made to work with the MSVC linker instead of LLD as with the MSVC backend (if anyone cared to wire it up with `-fuse-ld=`), and I'm not sure MSVC accepts both forms. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159639 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
