================
@@ -2028,7 +2028,9 @@ void StmtPrinter::VisitAtomicExpr(AtomicExpr *Node) {
       Node->getOp() != AtomicExpr::AO__atomic_load_n &&
       Node->getOp() != AtomicExpr::AO__scoped_atomic_load_n &&
       Node->getOp() != AtomicExpr::AO__opencl_atomic_load &&
-      Node->getOp() != AtomicExpr::AO__hip_atomic_load) {
+      Node->getOp() != AtomicExpr::AO__hip_atomic_load &&
+      Node->getOp() != AtomicExpr::AO__atomic_test_and_set &&
+      Node->getOp() != AtomicExpr::AO__atomic_clear) {
----------------
devajithvs wrote:

Yes, we do a similar check here, but it is part of a bigger switch case.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/fba55c89c32fd45cc279a903b5a749c5951f4593/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGAtomic.cpp#L904-L911

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159712
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to