https://github.com/hubert-reinterpretcast commented:
I am skeptical that this implements the wording of the papers.
Consider:
```cpp
typedef int import;
#define EMP
EMP import m;
```
There is no introduction of an _import-keyword_ in the above. The utterance of
`import` remains an identifier in after phase 4. The phase 7 grammar should see
`import` as a _typedef-name_.
Yet:
```
$ clang++ importIdentifier.cc -std=c++26 -fsyntax-only
importIdentifier.cc:3:5: error: the import directive is ill-formed, import
keyword must be immediately followed on the same line by an identifier, '<',
'"', or ':', but
not '::', after being at the start of a line or preceded by an export at
the start of the line
3 | EMP import m;
| ^
importIdentifier.cc:3:12: fatal error: module 'm' not found
3 | EMP import m;
| ^~
2 errors generated.
Return: 0x01:1 Wed Sep 17 23:06:08 2025 EDT
```
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107168
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
