bcardosolopes wrote: > I'm not sure I understand why ClangIR actually needs to lower RTTI objects, > however. This seems like exactly the sort of thing that should not, in fact, > be lowered in a high-level IR.
We might get there at some point, probably as soon as we have a new pass that wants to look into that information. We lift some operations early, but not all of them. In the meantime this allows us to make progress (build more C++ sources) by following the known patterns in original codegen. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157936 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
