================
@@ -8357,6 +8357,16 @@ NamedDecl *Sema::ActOnVariableDeclarator(
D.isFunctionDefinition());
}
+ // Warn about the use of a weak pointer authentication schema on a variable
----------------
martinuy wrote:
Sounds good, but I have a question. My understanding is that you are thinking
of moving both the condition we check and the `Diag` call into a separate
function. Considering that no action such as invalidating the declaration would
be taken on the caller side -at least for now-, shouldn't the return type of
the separate function be `void` (similar to `void
Sema::DiagnoseUniqueObjectDuplication(const VarDecl *)` or `void
Sema::DiagnoseAutoDeductionFailure(const VarDecl *, const Expr *)`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157779
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
