================
@@ -2162,11 +2166,17 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildLambdaExpr(SourceLocation
StartLoc,
PopExpressionEvaluationContext();
- sema::AnalysisBasedWarnings::Policy WP =
- AnalysisWarnings.getPolicyInEffectAt(EndLoc);
// We cannot release LSI until we finish computing captures, which
// requires the scope to be popped.
- Sema::PoppedFunctionScopePtr _ = PopFunctionScopeInfo(&WP,
LSI->CallOperator);
+ Sema::PoppedFunctionScopePtr _ = [&] {
+ if (LSI->CallOperator->getDescribedFunctionTemplate())
+ return PopFunctionScopeInfo(/*WP=*/nullptr,
+ TemplateOrNonTemplateCallOperatorDecl);
+
+ sema::AnalysisBasedWarnings::Policy WP =
+ AnalysisWarnings.getPolicyInEffectAt(EndLoc);
+ return PopFunctionScopeInfo(&WP, TemplateOrNonTemplateCallOperatorDecl);
+ }();
----------------
zyn0217 wrote:
can we just
```cpp
sema::AnalysisBasedWarnings::Policy *Policy = nullptr;
if (...)
Policy = &...;
```
afaik Policy is a pretty small object to create on a stack anyway so we should
avoid this nesting.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159364
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
