mstorsjo wrote: > I'm not opposed to this change but we might want to report that to GCC, it is > a false positive
GCC considers that enums potentially can have any representable value - this is a known longtime difference between GCC and Clang to the point that we have it mentioned in our [CodingStandards](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/docs/CodingStandards.rst#don-t-use-default-labels-in-fully-covered-switches-over-enumerations). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159330 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
