vbvictor wrote: >I was considering it more from a bump perspective - when bumping clang-tidy >this will lead to a lot of new hits, people may need to disable the entire >check just to get it through.
+1, my initial concern was about it. For such massive check, it would be hard to adopt. At least I'd make an option for `lambda` types. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157319 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
