NagyDonat wrote: @steakhal I looked through the code of this checker and added a few tests to ensure that all message kinds are covered by the testing (which implies high coverage for the whole checker: most of the logic is "behind" one kind of message). I was a bit surprised to see that I didn't have to add too much: it turns out that my patch preserved many existing messages and didn't introduce too many new situations.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157846 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
