llvmbot wrote:

<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Donát Nagy (NagyDonat)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

My recent commit a80c393a9c498279a1ec9fd630535b9ff139b49f accidentally added a 
paragraph which does not belong to the new documentation of the checker 
`security.VAList`; this commit corrects this mistake.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157440.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst (-5) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst b/clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst
index 76bd80b82a4d6..15d7557ae6af9 100644
--- a/clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst
@@ -1866,11 +1866,6 @@ security.VAList (C, C++)
 Reports use of uninitialized (or already released) ``va_list`` objects and
 situations where a ``va_start`` call is not followed by ``va_end``.
 
-Report out of bounds access to memory that is before the start or after the end
-of the accessed region (array, heap-allocated region, string literal etc.).
-This usually means incorrect indexing, but the checker also detects access via
-the operators ``*`` and ``->``.
-
 .. code-block:: c
 
  int test_use_after_release(int x, ...) {

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157440
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to