carlosgalvezp wrote: > and therefore doesn't need an option
Yeah I don't have a strong opinion. I was considering it more from a bump perspective - when bumping clang-tidy this will lead to a lot of new hits, people may need to disable the entire check just to get it through. But maybe there are better ways to solve it and we shouldn't be concerned about it. I agree that from a functionality point of view it doesn't make sense to allow one but not the other. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157319 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
