frasercrmck wrote: I don't really mind what they're called. As I said in the original RFC and PR that introduced the builtins, I have no particular favourites.
However, do note that the elementwise builtins are not *exactly* like clzg/ctzg in that they don't have _target-specific_ zero-is-undef behaviour - it's unconditionally zero-is-undef. That's perhaps one of the (few) arguments for naming them differently. This PR should also update libclc which is using these builtins. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157128 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
