R-Goc wrote: > I this so, yes, this is sufficiently weird and novel that it needs an RFC - I > am a bit surprised by the motivation, especially in light of MSVC > successfully deploying expected with `nodiscard` - Is this a solution in > search of a problem?
The original issue contains the reasoning of the libcxx maintainers about why they won't greenlight nodiscard std::expected without an attribute with this function. Some more discussions were on the libcxx discord channel. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154943 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
