s-barannikov wrote: > > And what's wrong with Passes anyway? > > See #156802 for a motivation for this change. If anybody wants to reference a > constant variable from OptimizationLevel (OptimizationLevel::O0, for example) > they have to add the extra Passes dependency, which seems a bit much for one > variable.
`Passes` library closely related (and is tiny btw). I don't see a problem in keeping OptimizationLevel there. If you move the definiton of `registerLateLoopOptimizationsEPCallback()` (used in #15602) from h to cpp file you would need to add the dependency on `Passes` anyway. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157057 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
