dexonsmith accepted this revision.
dexonsmith added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I think `-Wc++1z-mangling` is best.  IMO, with C++1z in the name, it's already 
clear that this is about compatibility.  I also don't think we need to get as 
specific as `-Wc++1z-compat-exception-spec`.

LGTM with that name, but you might wait a day or two in case someone has a 
strong opinion to the contrary.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D34251



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D34251: A... Akira Hatanaka via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D342... Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D342... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D342... Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D342... Akira Hatanaka via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to