mizvekov wrote: > Okay, if this is just a temporary oddity, that's fine. My big concern is that > "original" implies "first" and that doesn't match the comment on what's > returned. Because temporary measures have a tendency to ossify sometimes, it > might make sense to add some more comments to clarify the situation. WDYT?
> After this commit, the comment in `clang/include/clang/AST/Decl.h` for > `clang::TypeDecl::getTypeForDecl`, > isn't accurate any more, there's no more `ASTContext::getRecordType`. These are fixed by: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154395 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147835 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
