================
@@ -1887,7 +1887,19 @@ class CodeCompleteFlow {
for (auto &Cand : C.first) {
if (Cand.SemaResult &&
Cand.SemaResult->Kind == CodeCompletionResult::RK_Declaration) {
- auto ID = clangd::getSymbolID(Cand.SemaResult->getDeclaration());
+ const NamedDecl *DeclToLookup = Cand.SemaResult->getDeclaration();
+ // For instantiations of members of class templates, the
+ // documentation will be stored at the member's original
+ // declaration.
----------------
kadircet wrote:
do we know why the discrepancy exists between templated-code itself vs
non-templated decls (i.e. how come we get the decl with comments when we're
looking at `foo<int>()`)? I wonder if we should change something in
sema-codecomplete to refer to "spelled" declaration in completion-result for
non-templated cases (e.g. `bar` in `Foo<int>::bar()`) rather than working
around it here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153337
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
