tru wrote: > > How much slower is this? Last time I tested fatlto in our toolchain it took > > a VERY long time to link. > > > > You're probably thinking about "full" LTO, this is fat thin LTO. Our naming > is truly amazing. See https://llvm.org/docs/FatLTO.html. > > > > It should add about 10% overhead.
Oh great. In that case this seems fine! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140381 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
