hahnjo wrote: > Currently running all regression tests to make sure nothing else breaks.
Yes, all seems to work fine. > Historically, I believe we may have hit the same problem and our proposal was > to have additional functions to iterate over already loaded specializations: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D154328 We'll try to see if the change proposed here > is actually the correct fix for the underlying problem. It turns out the motivation is slightly different: We use the new methods in our `DeclUnloader` where we want to really avoid loading anything that we are in the process of removing. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150430 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
