================
@@ -208,11 +208,12 @@ void ClauseProcessor::processTODO(mlir::Location 
currentLocation,
     if (!x)
       return;
     unsigned version = semaCtx.langOptions().OpenMPVersion;
-    TODO(currentLocation,
-         "Unhandled clause " + llvm::omp::getOpenMPClauseName(id).upper() +
-             " in " +
-             llvm::omp::getOpenMPDirectiveName(directive, version).upper() +
-             " construct");
+    if (!semaCtx.langOptions().OpenMPSimd)
----------------
tblah wrote:

We could (in theory) have unhandled clauses on the simd directive

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150269
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to