================ @@ -208,11 +208,12 @@ void ClauseProcessor::processTODO(mlir::Location currentLocation, if (!x) return; unsigned version = semaCtx.langOptions().OpenMPVersion; - TODO(currentLocation, - "Unhandled clause " + llvm::omp::getOpenMPClauseName(id).upper() + - " in " + - llvm::omp::getOpenMPDirectiveName(directive, version).upper() + - " construct"); + if (!semaCtx.langOptions().OpenMPSimd) ---------------- tblah wrote:
We could (in theory) have unhandled clauses on the simd directive https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150269 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits