================
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy --match-partial-fixes %s
llvm-use-new-mlir-op-builder %t
+
+namespace mlir {
+class Location {};
+class OpBuilder {
+public:
+ template <typename OpTy, typename... Args>
+ OpTy create(Location location, Args &&...args) {
+ return OpTy(args...);
+ }
+ Location getUnknownLoc() { return Location(); }
+};
+class ImplicitLocOpBuilder : public OpBuilder {
+public:
+ template <typename OpTy, typename... Args>
+ OpTy create(Args &&...args) {
+ return OpTy(args...);
+ }
+};
+struct ModuleOp {
+ ModuleOp() {}
+ static ModuleOp create(OpBuilder &builder, Location location) {
+ return ModuleOp();
+ }
+};
+struct NamedOp {
+ NamedOp(const char* name) {}
+ static NamedOp create(OpBuilder &builder, Location location, const char*
name) {
+ return NamedOp(name);
+ }
+};
+} // namespace mlir
+
+#define ASSIGN(A, B, C, D) A = B.create<C>(B.getUnknownLoc(), D)
+
+template <typename T>
+void g(mlir::OpBuilder &b) {
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+2]]:3: warning: use OpType::create(builder, ...)
instead of builder.create<OpType>(...) [llvm-use-new-mlir-op-builder]
----------------
PiotrZSL wrote:
shoudn't be: 'OpType::create(builder, ...)' ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149148
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
