aaron.ballman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33735#770296, @ABataev wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33735#770288, @aaron.ballman wrote: > > > Can you help me to understand what problem is being solved with this new > > attribute? Under what circumstances would the first argument be an > > `ImplicitParamDecl` but not an implicit this or self? > > > For captured regions an outlined function is created, where all parameters > are ImplicitParamDecls. And the very first parameter is wrongly treated as > 'this' argument of the member function. Ah, thank you! That makes sense to me, but it begs the question: why an attribute rather than a bit on ImplicitParamDecl? https://reviews.llvm.org/D33735 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
