================ @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +// REQUIRES: lld + +/// Check DTLTO options are forwarded to the linker. + +// RUN: echo "--target=x86_64-linux-gnu \ +// RUN: -Xthinlto-distributor=distarg1 \ +// RUN: -Xthinlto-distributor=distarg2,distarg3 \ +// RUN: -fuse-ld=lld" > %t.rsp ---------------- bd1976bris wrote:
> I'm not sure I follow you here, so maybe I'm missing some context? First, I > don't see any response file other than the one you're creating here. Hmm... I think your comment might be attached to the commit you made the comment against rather than the branch as it is now, try: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147265/files and then click on `clang/test/Driver/DTLTO/dtlto.c` in the sidebar. > Or are you relying on substitution happening in the `echo` command? If so, > that isn't a practice I've seen in many tests, and I'm not sure we want to > encourage more use of that pattern. It's quite a nice way to make tests more readable when there are various test cases where the tools in the test all accept some common set of options, no? A `lit` macro might be another way of achieving this, but I'm not sure that many people are familiar with the syntax. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147265 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
