================
@@ -1669,6 +1669,90 @@ def GetGlobalOp : CIR_Op<"get_global",
}];
}
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// SetBitfieldOp
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+def SetBitfieldOp : CIR_Op<"set_bitfield"> {
+ let summary = "Set the value of a bitfield member";
+ let description = [{
+ The `cir.set_bitfield` operation provides a store-like access to
+ a bit field of a record.
+
+ It expects an address of a storage where to store, a type of the storage,
+ a value being stored, a name of a bit field, a pointer to the storage in
the
+ base record, a size of the storage, a size the bit field, an offset
+ of the bit field and a sign. Returns a value being stored.
+
+ A unit attribute `volatile` can be used to indicate a volatile load of the
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
Do you have any tests below for a 'volatile' load'? Also the store should be
volatile too, right? Should we mention that more elequently?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147609
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
