AaronBallman wrote: > Thansk for the explainer! That gives me something to test, I will try a > cross-compile with GCC and see if I can reproduce it locally. > > > It's not immediately obvious to me why the host compiler would make any > > difference on this particular PR ... > > We are changing how the Clang-Python bindings are tested, and in the process > revisiting which platforms are marked as `XFAIL` and `UNSUPPORTED`. system-z > was previously unsupported, and moving it to `XFAIL` led to the issues you > see here. So the failure isn't so much caused by something introduced in this > PR, it's probably been failing for years but just wasn't tested. If I can't > find a way to resolve this, I'll probably just mark it as `UNSUPPORTED` again
Ah, that makes sense, thank you for the explanation! I think UNSUPPORTED is a reasonable option. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146844 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
