=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.n...@ericsson.com>, =?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.n...@ericsson.com>, =?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.n...@ericsson.com>, =?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.n...@ericsson.com>, =?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.n...@ericsson.com>, =?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.n...@ericsson.com> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147...@github.com>
github-actions[bot] wrote: <!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}--> :warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning: <details> <summary> You can test this locally with the following command: </summary> ``````````bash git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions h,cpp -- clang/test/Analysis/test-member-invalidation.cpp clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/NoOwnershipChangeVisitor.h clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp `````````` </details> <details> <summary> View the diff from clang-format here. </summary> ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp index 526e1e6e8..073d80dc8 100644 --- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp @@ -384,14 +384,13 @@ struct DynMemFrontend : virtual public CheckerFrontend, public BT_PROVIDERS... { //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// class MallocChecker - : public CheckerFamily<check::DeadSymbols, check::PointerEscape, - check::ConstPointerEscape, check::PreStmt<ReturnStmt>, - check::EndFunction, check::PreCall, check::PostCall, - eval::Call, check::NewAllocator, - check::PostStmt<BlockExpr>, check::PostObjCMessage, - check::Location, eval::Assume> { + : public CheckerFamily< + check::DeadSymbols, check::PointerEscape, check::ConstPointerEscape, + check::PreStmt<ReturnStmt>, check::EndFunction, check::PreCall, + check::PostCall, eval::Call, check::NewAllocator, + check::PostStmt<BlockExpr>, check::PostObjCMessage, check::Location, + eval::Assume> { public: - /// In pessimistic mode, the checker assumes that it does not know which /// functions might free the memory. /// In optimistic mode, the checker assumes that all user-defined functions @@ -3918,7 +3917,8 @@ void ento::registerDynamicMemoryModeling(CheckerManager &Mgr) { Chk->ShouldIncludeOwnershipAnnotatedFunctions = Mgr.getAnalyzerOptions().getCheckerBooleanOption(DMMName, "Optimistic"); Chk->ShouldRegisterNoOwnershipChangeVisitor = - Mgr.getAnalyzerOptions().getCheckerBooleanOption(DMMName, "AddNoOwnershipChangeNotes"); + Mgr.getAnalyzerOptions().getCheckerBooleanOption( + DMMName, "AddNoOwnershipChangeNotes"); } bool ento::shouldRegisterDynamicMemoryModeling(const CheckerManager &mgr) { `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147080 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits