=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.n...@ericsson.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.n...@ericsson.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.n...@ericsson.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.n...@ericsson.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.n...@ericsson.com>,
=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <donat.n...@ericsson.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147...@github.com>


github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. 
:warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions h,cpp -- 
clang/test/Analysis/test-member-invalidation.cpp 
clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp 
clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/NoOwnershipChangeVisitor.h 
clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp 
b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp
index 526e1e6e8..073d80dc8 100644
--- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/MallocChecker.cpp
@@ -384,14 +384,13 @@ struct DynMemFrontend : virtual public CheckerFrontend, 
public BT_PROVIDERS... {
 
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
 class MallocChecker
-    : public CheckerFamily<check::DeadSymbols, check::PointerEscape,
-                     check::ConstPointerEscape, check::PreStmt<ReturnStmt>,
-                     check::EndFunction, check::PreCall, check::PostCall,
-                     eval::Call, check::NewAllocator,
-                     check::PostStmt<BlockExpr>, check::PostObjCMessage,
-                     check::Location, eval::Assume> {
+    : public CheckerFamily<
+          check::DeadSymbols, check::PointerEscape, check::ConstPointerEscape,
+          check::PreStmt<ReturnStmt>, check::EndFunction, check::PreCall,
+          check::PostCall, eval::Call, check::NewAllocator,
+          check::PostStmt<BlockExpr>, check::PostObjCMessage, check::Location,
+          eval::Assume> {
 public:
-
   /// In pessimistic mode, the checker assumes that it does not know which
   /// functions might free the memory.
   /// In optimistic mode, the checker assumes that all user-defined functions
@@ -3918,7 +3917,8 @@ void ento::registerDynamicMemoryModeling(CheckerManager 
&Mgr) {
   Chk->ShouldIncludeOwnershipAnnotatedFunctions =
       Mgr.getAnalyzerOptions().getCheckerBooleanOption(DMMName, "Optimistic");
   Chk->ShouldRegisterNoOwnershipChangeVisitor =
-      Mgr.getAnalyzerOptions().getCheckerBooleanOption(DMMName, 
"AddNoOwnershipChangeNotes");
+      Mgr.getAnalyzerOptions().getCheckerBooleanOption(
+          DMMName, "AddNoOwnershipChangeNotes");
 }
 
 bool ento::shouldRegisterDynamicMemoryModeling(const CheckerManager &mgr) {

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147080
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to