================ @@ -20629,6 +20629,9 @@ Sema::ConditionResult Sema::ActOnCondition(Scope *S, SourceLocation Loc, case ConditionKind::ConstexprIf: Cond = CheckBooleanCondition(Loc, SubExpr, true); + assert(isa<FullExpr>(Cond.get()) && ---------------- erichkeane wrote:
`Cond` could still be invalid here, right? so `.get` would be ill-formed? Should we be doing some sort of `if (Cond.isUsable())` or something? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146890 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits