ChuanqiXu9 wrote:

> I'm not suggesting to treat CodeGenOptions as incompatible by default. For 
> now I'm just trying to remove the duplication and improve the 
> infrastructure.CodeGenOptions are still benign by default, and can only be 
> marked as compatible, which doesn't have any impact on explicitly-built 
> modules. This PR is intended to be an NFC.

Then it sounds good to me.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146422
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to