On 24 May 2017 at 15:06, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > I think this is expected. Clang has an extension where it treats 1.0if as a > _Complex float if no operator""if is available;
Since it's breaking some bots, I've reverted my commit while we hash this out. r303813. > libc++ has an extension > where std::complex<float> can be initialized from _Complex float. For the > same reason, that code has historically worked in C++11 and C++98 modes. Are you sure? It looks like it does an implicit cast to float (discarding the imaginary part) and then calls the "complex(float, float = 0.0)" constructor to me. Cheers. Tim. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
