rjmccall wrote: > Slightly independently, cpu_supports might turn out a bit difficult to use, > at least for us (and I suspect other targets), as the feature definitions are > often ad hoc and sadly mutable.
Hmm. Well, you get to define what feature names you recognize in `__builtin_cpu_supports`, so there's no reason to use marketing names, and if they're unstable you probably shouldn't. But I would imagine there's *some* stable technical grouping that's coarser-grained than whether an individual builtin is available. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134016 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
