================
@@ -258,6 +258,30 @@ void CIRGenFunction::emitDelegateCXXConstructorCall(
/*Delegating=*/true, thisAddr, delegateArgs, loc);
}
+void CIRGenFunction::emitImplicitAssignmentOperatorBody(FunctionArgList &args)
{
+ const auto *assignOp = cast<CXXMethodDecl>(curGD.getDecl());
+ const Stmt *rootS = assignOp->getBody();
+ assert(isa<CompoundStmt>(rootS) &&
+ "Body of an implicit assignment operator should be compound stmt.");
+ const auto *rootCS = cast<CompoundStmt>(rootS);
+
+ // LexicalScope Scope(*this, RootCS->getSourceRange());
+ // FIXME(cir): add all of the below under a new scope.
----------------
andykaylor wrote:
It wasn't clear to me why a new scope would be needed here. Since this is
emitting the body of the assignment operator, I think the scope will always be
the same as the scope for the function, right?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145979
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
