rorth wrote:

I'd already acknowledged the failure and provided a possible 1-line patch 
(which I cannot test).  Instead of doing that, you chose to revert.

I'm totally tired of that constant merge/revert/reland/revert/... churn that is 
so typical of LLVM.  I can fully understand reversal if a patch breaks builds 
or causes failures on many bots.  A single `XPASS` on a single bot doesn't seem 
so critical to me, especially if there's already a suggestion for a fix.

This has already taken way too long; I've no more time of energy for this: 
consider this patch dropped.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145855
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to