================
@@ -43,6 +43,11 @@ void call_snprintf(double d, int n, int *ptr) {
__builtin_snprintf(node_name, sizeof(node_name), "%pOFn", ptr); //
nonkprintf-warning {{'snprintf' will always be truncated; specified size is 6,
but format string expands to at least 7}}
__builtin_snprintf(node_name, sizeof(node_name), "12345%pOFn", ptr); //
nonkprintf-warning {{'snprintf' will always be truncated; specified size is 6,
but format string expands to at least 12}}
__builtin_snprintf(node_name, sizeof(node_name), "123456%pOFn", ptr); //
nonkprintf-warning {{'snprintf' will always be truncated; specified size is 6,
but format string expands to at least 13}}
+ __builtin_snprintf(buf, 6, "%5.1f", 9.f);
+ __builtin_snprintf(buf, 6, "%+5.1f", 9.f);
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
I think we don't need to add a test for + and ' ' unless that's missing
coverage in general, because the diagnostic is orthogonal to the work here
which is more about calculating the expected length of the resulting string.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144274
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
