llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Samira Bakon (bazuzi) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> Reverts llvm/llvm-project#<!-- -->145520 Exposed function is no longer needed and side-stepped the intended contract that the present children are the same set returned by `getModeledFields()` and presence shouldn't need to be queried for arbitrary fields. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145710.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/StorageLocation.h (-2) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/StorageLocation.h b/clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/StorageLocation.h index 8b263b16d5b1e..8fcc6a44027a0 100644 --- a/clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/StorageLocation.h +++ b/clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/StorageLocation.h @@ -168,8 +168,6 @@ class RecordStorageLocation final : public StorageLocation { return {Children.begin(), Children.end()}; } - bool hasChild(const ValueDecl &D) const { return Children.contains(&D); } - private: FieldToLoc Children; SyntheticFieldMap SyntheticFields; `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145710 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
