================ @@ -520,6 +520,9 @@ def warn_drv_math_errno_enabled_after_veclib: Warning< "math errno enabled by '%0' after it was implicitly disabled by '%1'," " this may limit the utilization of the vector library">, InGroup<MathErrnoEnabledWithVecLib>; +def warn_drv_gcc_incompatible_complex_range_override: Warning< + "combination of '%0' and '%1' results in complex number calculations incompatible with GCC">, ---------------- AaronBallman wrote:
> Does this mean that if we are going to emit both -Woverriding-option and > -Wgcc-compat warnings, the warning messages should be combined into one? Yeah, I would combine it into one under the `-Woverriding-option` and use a `%select` so that the GCC compatibility parts are optionally emitted. > If there is a way to determine whether the -Woverriding-option option is > specified during driver processing IIRC, you can do that by adding an explicit compiler option for it, like: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/31bf9348fa10fc95c4a86ef81485652152bf9906/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td#L896C5-L896C17 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/31bf9348fa10fc95c4a86ef81485652152bf9906/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp#L6455 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144468 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
