mdavis36 wrote:

Thank you all for weighing in here. It seems there is some disagreement on how 
to move forward with this. I believe the current change addresses the initial 
issue this PR is tied to, which aimed to clarify this attribute affects more 
than just explicit specializations defined by users.

I'm happy to make a change here to be more verbose like what @frederick-vs-ja 
suggested if that is what is preferred by the maintainers.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143839
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to