vbvictor wrote: > Your concern that "However, we will still try to model "incorrect" getline > methods, wasting cpu." is very premature optimization, the runtime change > would be totally negligible
Indeed, without measurements, this argument is not viable. I've investigated the code of `StdLibraryFunctionsChecker` and the part that deals with function signatures can be extracted in separate file without many problems. For now, I can implement more error-handling as in option 2 and refactor `StdLibraryFunctionsChecker` later if needed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145229 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits