llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Michael Davis (mdavis36) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> # Summary This PR resolves issue #<!-- -->143719. - Removes "explcitly" from the documentation on `[[clang::no_specialization]]` to better match behavior of specialization as defined by the C++ standard. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143839.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td (+2-2) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td b/clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td index 047f51ffa59ed..508cf6d427a52 100644 --- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td +++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td @@ -1216,8 +1216,8 @@ def NoSpecializationsDocs : Documentation { let Category = DocCatDecl; let Content = [{ ``[[clang::no_specializations]]`` can be applied to function, class, or variable -templates which should not be explicitly specialized by users. This is primarily -used to diagnose user specializations of standard library type traits. +templates which should not be specialized by users. This is primarily used to +diagnose user specializations of standard library type traits. }]; } `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143839 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
