4vtomat wrote: > @4vtomat you did the opposite of this in > [65dc96c](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/65dc96c2cfa480b070c7913ac5e313c98ca96520). > What changed now? > > It was explicitly stated by one of the crypto authors here that Zvknhb does > not imply Zvknha [riscv/riscv-crypto#364 > (comment)](https://github.com/riscv/riscv-crypto/issues/364#issuecomment-1726782096)
Oh, I don't even remember I changed this before lol, thanks for the context! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142896 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
