AaronBallman wrote: > If you feel that there's a technical reason that the compiler output is no > longer reasonable, you are welcome to bring it up as a technical argument. My > point is simply that "my transform stopped working because clang's compiler > output changed" is not, in and of itself, clang's problem to solve.
Agreed; while we aim to not be disruptive with changes, such changes are expected and reasonable. @BukeBeyond -- please familiarize yourself with our community [Code of Conduct](https://llvm.org/docs/CodeOfConduct.html). Telling people who they are speaking for, accusing people of malicious intent, and demeaning people are not in line with our community standards. Editing your comments and/or adding a small apology would be appropriate. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115821 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
