[clang] [llvm] [ARM, AArch64] Don't put BTI at asm goto branch targets (PR #141562)

[Peter Smith via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -2042,6 +2042,17 @@ references can be used instead of numeric references.
       return -1;
   }
 
+ASM Goto versus Branch Target Enforcement
----------------
smithp35 wrote:

Good idea to update the LanguageExtensions.rst and LangRef.rst. I think it 
would be worth updating the release notes too as this is a potentially breaking 
change for someone exclusively using clang and relying on the existing 
behaviour.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141562
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits