brad0 wrote: > You mean adding support for `i386`?
Yes. > From what I understand about the linked issue, x86 is failing due to some > signal frame unwinding function prototypes got leaked to general Haiku code, > `_LIBUNWIND_TARGET_HAIKU`, but the implementation part got an additional > `_LIBUNWIND_TARGET_X86_64` check. > This PR guards both under `_LIBUNWIND_CHECK_HAIKU_SIGRETURN`, which has both > the OS and architecture checks, effectively "fixing" `i386`. I wasn't sure if that was the case or not. That's what it looks like, but I wasn't sure if it built on i386 and whether it has been build tested to ensure that is the case. At least building is still a step forward from not being able to build, which AFAIK, that is the case out of the box on i386 at the moment. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135367 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
