jurahul wrote: > Hi, no objections to the patch, but I am wondering if there is a larger > reason behind this effort to simplify all these uses of getTrailingObjects. > > Are you planning on an API change in this area for instance?
Not really. I added simplifications to the TrailingObjects class last week and this is just a series of changes to adopt the simplifications in the codebase. Nothing more beyond such NFC patches planned. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140078 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
