jmmartinez wrote: > This seems reasonable. Can you update the description to explain the > motivation for the change, though? Is it a bug you are trying to fix, or a > specific scenario you think should be optimized? Thanks
I've updated the description with an explanation of the situation that triggered the issue for us. But in the wider scheme, I think that no preprocessing the preprocessor's output is the actual desired behavior. Thanks! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137665 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
