jhuber6 wrote: > > It's just the AMDGCN target without any `+features`, right? The only issue > > I was aware of was assuming w64 when unspecified but you fixed that > > previously. > > Almost, but it's problematic in several ways. The problems multiply once you > start adding in manually specified target_features attributes
I don't do that anywhere so probably why I haven't encountered those issues (so far). Though I wonder how the proposed AMDGCN version of `__nvvm_reflect` Alex is working on will interact with that as well, since I think the SPIR-V target would share similar issues if we're emitting builtins that require certain target features? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139281 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
