================
@@ -40,3 +40,13 @@ struct S : public Base1<int>, public Base2<float> {
// All initializers are correct, nothing to skip, diagnose 2 missing commas.
S(const S &) : Base1<int>(0) ::Base2<float>(1.0) x(2) {} //
expected-error2{{missing ',' between base or member initializers}}
};
+
+namespace GH113722 {
+struct S {
+ void m(int x = 0; // expected-error {{unexpected end of default argument
expression}} \
+ expected-note {{to match this '('}}
+ #pragma unused(x) // expected-error {{expected ')'}} \
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
Does this mean we can't have pragmas in the middle of a statement? It seems
that something like the above is actually useful/a shame to lose. It would be
wonderful if instead the ConsumeAndStoreInitializer just 'did the pragma
parsing and came back', but I presume that is a lot more work?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139595
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
