AaronBallman wrote: > > @Sirraide, wait, did we all miss this PR? I am so sorry > > This was a while ago, but I recall talking to @AaronBallman about this one > several times, and I think our conclusion at some point was that it wasn’t > worth supporting this divergent behaviour or sth like that but I could be > wrong (we also had a discussion about in one of the Wednesday meetings iirc).
That matches my recollection. Use of `__restrict` on member functions is an outlier to begin with, there's divergence between compilers already, there's a reasonable chance of silent breaking changes by caring about `__restrict` where we didn't used to, so it seemed like we'd want more motivation before going down this path. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83855 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
