================
@@ -5975,9 +5975,22 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunction(EvalInfo &Info,
SourceLocation CallLoc,
Definition->hasAttr<MSConstexprAttr>())))
return true;
- if (Info.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11) {
- const FunctionDecl *DiagDecl = Definition ? Definition : Declaration;
+ const FunctionDecl *DiagDecl = Definition ? Definition : Declaration;
+ // Special note for the assert() macro, as the normal error message falsely
+ // implies we cannot use an assertion during constant evaluation.
+ if (CallLoc.isMacroID() && DiagDecl->getIdentifier()) {
+ // FIXME: Instead of checking for an implementation-defined function,
+ // check and evaluate the assert() macro.
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
Any reason why you are not doing that in this PR?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130458
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
