Sirraide wrote:

> This seems like a good way to do it, since it clearly documents what's going 
> on. LLVM is the only project I've seen with such a policy; across all of 
> chromium's dependencies, the extra `virtual` specifiers we flagged were 
> indeed mistakes. The issue with libc++ was more to do with infrastructure 
> than the warning itself, IIUC.

Alright, in that case I’d say it would be nice to do that in a follow-up pr so 
we can stop disabling the warning.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138741
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to